So Obama IS a Socialist after all.....

The big story of the day is that things that were barely touched upon, barely covered, barely reported, barely discussed back in 2008, when Barack Obama was running for the presidency, have now been proved to be unequivocally and factually correct. Correct . That includes his relationship with Bill Ayers, his relationship with the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, his palling around with radical nut jobs like Rashid Khalidi and other sorts of America-hating whack jobs. It always has been Obama’s goal, his mission, hell, his purpose in life was to call into mind and to question the actual existence of these United States. I mean, folks, it all makes sense now that all the facts are being exposed....



Now, look. This is not news to I. I was well apprised of this a long time ago because I’ve been a fan of and I’ve been reading what Dr. Stanley Kurtz has been writing about Obama. So I was not surprised by this one iota. Now, apparently many of you people are not surprised by it, either. I don’t know if that’s a good thing or a bad thing. But here’s what remains the challenge: What are we going to do about it?

And what I’m talking about is Dr. Stanley Kurtz’s book, it comes out next week, “Radical-in-Chief: Barack Obama and the Untold Story of American Socialism.” The most shocking part of this, as I told you when I was reading this, was that it was the goal of those who were promoting Obama or someone like Obama that they would use groups like ACORN and Project Vote to swell the ranks of Democrats with poor and minority voters. And that their socialism would emerge as the natural ideology of the have-nots. This is a takeover of the American government. This is a takeover from within of our social systems and our institutions.

Now, they’re not finished with their takeover yet because it was quite a massive undertaking to try and consume all of it. This is the radical change that Obama has always been talking about. As a matter of fact, this is what change and hope meant. Change and hope meant throw out liberty, or what little liberty remained after the socialists began their conquests back in 1913, throw out the remaining remnants of liberty, throw out the remaining constraints against what limited the power and the reach of government, throw that out and replace it with something that felt good. It was all sticky and sugary sweet. Why, we’ve got to get rid of these banks. We have to get rid of these people, these shysters, these crooks, these criminals that are out there loaning money to your kids in student loans and what have you, and that own these car companies and these other corporations. We must get rid of them and replace them with the kind of people we want to put in there. And then we will loan them government money, and we will invest in this and that and the other.

I will make Obama’s radical past today’s story, because you people that have been called wackos and nut jobs and racists and hicks and hayseeds and what have you because you oppose Obama so vehemently, and that Obama’s rise to power and the way he has used his power has set alarm bells ringing off in your head, this justifies your alarm bells. This gives credibility to your fears. You feared this guy for the right reasons. He is a Marxist lunatic.

Now, let me take you back to August of 2008, as I have been suffering under this for over two years now. “Oh, you’re just jealous. You know what you are, Chris, you’re just a racist. Why don’t you just come out of the closet, admit it? Get the sheet and hoods out of the closet.” And as I’ve been telling you, and I have been talking about this for over two and a half years when I heard Obama give this particular speech:

"that he’s running for the presidency because he wants to bring philosophy to an end, or a particular philosophy. Well, that philosophy is the philosophy of what you people call the free market. We haven’t had one since the 1800s. But it has been called a free market. And the other philosophy is the philosophy of embracing liberty in the individual over collectivism in the state."

I heard him give the same speech on consecutive days, when I heard him give this speech I was shocked and mortified. i remember thinking,"I’m the only one that thinks that there’s anything wrong with this????" Was anyone else listening to this radical marxist racist???? I guess not, I mean hes the president right?

You see, socialists, in order to operate, they must confiscate the wealth of the people. And then they put all-knowing, all-caring, social engineers in the place of people that were running businesses before. And they run them for the social good. They don’t run them for profit. It doesn’t work anywhere it’s ever been tried. It’s not going to work here. As a matter of fact, it’s not working here. Look at the state of economic affairs around you. But it was shocking to me that Obama was out there saying he wanted to bring philosophies to an end, and people were cheering.
You don’t bring philosophies to an end....
Dictators bring philosophies to an end....
Violent revolutions bring philosophies to an end....
But there was Obama, out there throwing this stuff up, like a mama bird spitting up chewed up worms down her chicks throats on the campaign trail and being cheered for it. So let me take you back and remind you what this madman has said:

Obama: ...have a stake in each other, that I am my brother’s keeper, I am my sister’s keeper.

Question: Yes or no, eliminate the electoral college, yes or no. Obama: Yes.

Obama: We need to stop sending $3 billion a year to banks that provide student loans the government could provide directly to students for less.(hows this one worked out for you lazy, shiftless, mooching off your parents, college pukes???)

Obama: We can’t afford to wait any longer. We need this fund to help New Hampshire and states across the country pay for healthcare and education, police and firefighters.(because you dumb pions in your individual towns can`t seem to handle it)

Obama: I think, when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.(you mean good for the losers that won`t go out and take care of themselves or their families)

Obama: That does involve us spreading around opportunity.

Obama: And this economic catastrophe is the final verdict on this failed philosophy, a philosophy that we cannot afford to continue. And one of the reasons I am running for the presidency of the United States is to bring this philosophy to an end.(only because of these oh so many liberal policies and dem interventions into our so called free market)

Now, he said it. I didn’t say it. He said it, “is to bring this philosophy to an end.” Now, when you read Kurtz’s piece here, it all makes sense. And again, if you missed it last hour, I’ll read you the summary:

“The pattern of misdirection upon which President Obama’s political career has been built has its roots in the socialist background of community organizing. ACORN, Rev. Wright, and Bill Ayers were all routes into that hidden socialist world, and that is why Obama has had to obscure the truth about these and other elements of his past. More important, the President’s socialist past is still very much alive in the governing philosophy and long-term political strategy of the Obama administration. As we move into the first national election of the Obama presidency, Americans are confronted with a fateful choice. Either we will continue to be subject to President Obama’s radical and only ... partially revealed plans for our future, or we will place a strong check on the President’s ambitions. Knowing the truth about Obama’s past is the best way to safeguard our future.”

That is why everyone must know the facts about this true racial divider, and i suggest you all start with this small but factual article written by Dr. Stanley Kurtz......

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/249390/obama%E2%80%99s-radical-past-stanley-kurtz

and then read his book, "Radical-in-Chief: Barack Obama and the Untold Story of American Socialism"



So it shouldn’t come as a shock, really, if you have been watching what’s been going on, have been watching what this guy has been doing, have been watching who he has appointed to positions of power and the way he’s operated.

What ought to be a shock, though, is the dismissal by so many in the Parrot Press Corps, fringe media, academia, political circles and what have you, when you admit that, wait a minute, there’s just something not right about this guy. And you say that, why, the first reaction is “racist, bigot, hick, hayseed,” you know, you hear it all the time, radical Tea Party extremists, they’re just responding to Obama’s race. No. You people, or many of you people, have been correct all along. Your instincts were good. You smelled out the socialist. You sniffed it out. You knew as soon as he started it didn’t seem right. You knew as soon as this stuff started, and the explanations that were given for it, that it just didn’t seem right. There is something intrinsically and inherently wrong with being president of a country that once upon a time prized individual achievement and individualism and has thrown that overboard.

So, for how long has the left claimed that all this comes from conservative conspiracy theorist nut jobs. It’s not a conspiracy anymore. It’s only a conspiracy if you don’t know about it. I mean, this isn’t Mulder and Scully tooling around in the Antarctic, looking for Obama’s buried ancestors in the Antarctic ice that came from some faraway planet, are we? This has actually happened in real-time, right in front of your face; hasn’t it?

We Now Owe Greece Because Of Their Unions - Makes Sense Don't It

I don’t share the intuition or the instinctive move that some of you do that violence is ahead(although alot of you people do), that the way – that things are going to devolve to the point where there’s going to be shooting. I just, I think that the situation, and because of the amount of people and the geographic area that is concerned here, is just too large for that. I mean, we’re aware, and don’t take this wrong, you people, you’re going to go out there and go, we’re a bunch of socialists. We’re a bunch of soviets.” We’re where the soviet republics were in the late 1980s, struggling and grappling with the end of communism and struggling and grappling with what was called “perestroika” at the time, what direction did the soviet republics, which are filled with people that are not communists, they never wanted to be communists, they were forced into being communists.

And what did the soviet republics do people? And there was no shots fired. Gorbachev didn’t try and stop them when they began seceding out of the Soviet Union, just said the heck with this, no more, we’re going to make our own laws. You don’t run us anymore. You know, point your nukes somewhere else, we’re done with you. And I think that that is really the direction that reasonable individuals in this union ought to be looking. The utility, the utility of the union that once was is an anchor around many people’s necks because the parasite class and the government class has expanded to the point to where an honest man cannot make an honest wage and get ahead in his life because so much of it is taken from him. And so many rules are put on him in that endeavor. I mean, we’re being sold to the Third World and to big global banks at some levels.

Matter of fact, I got a story here today, Senator Jim DeMint, did you know this, says that part of the Greek bailout is going to be paid by U.S. taxpayers(80 billion). Did you go to work this morning, Bart, thinking that an hour of your labor was going to be given to some Grecian hack over there who’s demanding his pension be honored? We’re where the soviets were. And the soviets – imagine this. We’re Americans. We’re supposed to be the beacons of liberty. And we’re sitting here telling people, oh, no, you’re a slave to this union forever, bucko. Get used to it. And the people that were actual slaves, military slaves to a union, the soviet republics, said no, we’re not slaves, and they got out of it. We have this backwards, don’t we?

There’s two concepts that are at war here really. One is that people are idiots. People are, by and large, lazy, shiftless fools and idiots. And because they are idiots, we must not allow the idiots to live in the conditions that they themselves create for themselves. We must do everything in our power, because we’re not idiots, to mitigate their own influence on their own lives. And so to do that, since we’ve given up on charity, we have to have these things called governments. And government has to take wealth and transfer it from the people that aren’t idiots to the idiot class.

The scam is, is that the idiots are being confiscated from, and their wealth is being transferred to the elite, to the smart class. The wealth transfers happen in reverse. We keep hearing about wealth transfers. Well, where’s the wealth going to? It’s not just going to the recipient class. It’s also going to Mr. Goldman and Mr. Sachs. It is also going to Mr. Blankfein. It is also going to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. These people aren’t poor. They live in bigger houses than you do. It’s also going to people that are running around, working at these things called think tanks, working at various government agencies doing nothing other than harassing people. Do they live in Section 8 housing? No, they live in nicer houses than most of us do.

And the other, the competing, and the philosophy that ought to hold sway, that held sway for Mr. Jefferson and for the founding generation, was that that centralization is the bane of human existence. It has created war, wreaked havoc, and made people slaves for all of recorded history. We had that one little sliver in there from the founding of Jamestown all the way up until, say, the mid-1930s or so, where men and women on this continent, by and large – don’t call me up about slavery – were by and large masters of their own destinies and were free. You can argue about how free they were or what governments did or did not do. But by and large they were free.

And when I say it’s a sliver, I mean, we have 8,000 years of recorded history, so 300 years is a sliver. Small fraction of it. In the last 70 years we have lived under the opposite of the way that our forefathers lived. And there are some people that are content with that. And yet they parade themselves around as conservatives. And I always want to ask them the question, what exactly are you trying to conserve? And is it those big alabaster-clad pillared buildings in Washington, D.C.? You know how many people think that it’s a great tourist destination to go see the pillars and the monuments that government has erected to itself in Washington? Do you realize how sick that is? Think about that for, oh, I want to go to D.C. for vacation this year. I want to go see this. Other than the Jefferson Memorial, there’s really not much to see, than the museum that was erected by, oh, what was his name, oh, I’ve got a brain spasm. He was the treasury secretary for three presidents. Carnegie, Andrew Carnegie. Not Andrew Carnegie. Oh, man. It’ll come to me in a minute. Anyways, there’s a – he built a museum to compete with Roosevelt’s government-funded museum. And I can’t think of his name to save my life. But that museum is still there.

But think about that concept. Do you think George Washington would want that obelisk at the end of the Mall there in his honor? He’d puke on it. He’d retch. He’d go, like, you need to tear that – first thing we’re going to do is tear that down. So we have a view that government is good instead of a view that government is necessary. There’s a difference. Government is necessary. But is it good? Well, our founders didn’t believe that it was good, and they did everything in their power to mitigate what it could do to you and what it could do to me. This is why you’ll see throughout the writings of the founding generation, just look at the Preamble. We the People, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, provide for the common defense, ensure domestic tranquility, and to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and who? – our posterity – do ordain and establish this Constitution. They looked forward and future.

And the reason there is a written Constitution was because – is and was because it was an attempt to limit what government could do because history demonstrated, all history, that’s Helvetic history, that’s Roman history, that’s Greek history, that’s Egyptian history, that’s all the history of the Middle Ages, that’s European history, all history demonstrated governments were not to be trusted. And only when people were free to make their own decisions and to interact among themselves in an ordered society with a limited government was there true freedom and liberty. And yet today we sit here and we think that, oh, we can manage our government, though. Yeah, we can send Gingrich up there, and Romney, and they’ll manage it for us [raspberry]. Your friends and neighbors believe this, ladies and gentlemen. And as long as they do, then you will always go to work, and you will always slave at their behest. I say take the founders’ red pill and reject the whole damn thing. “Oh, we’re going to have a fair and balanced debate. This guy’s a conservative, and that girl’s a liberal.” What the hell is a liberal anymore? How do we even know?