Response to obams` (unpresidential) state of the union address....

I will present to you an accurate, honest accounting on the actual condition of our affairs, not what I would like for you to believe they are.

First let’s go over some vocabulary we’ll be using tonight that you may not be familiar with starting with The Constitution. The Constitution Is what’s contained in this pocket sized book. Inside it you will find a plan of government, our government. It means what the men who wrote and ratified it said that it meant to them not what you would like it to mean today. If you are unhappy that this document places restrictions on what you would like our federal government to do for you or to another citizen then please read Article V of this Constitution, there you will find instructions on how to amend the document so that it rises to your expectations.



Our Second vocabulary word is Entitlement: If I have earned a sum of money and I deposit it in a safe in my home, I am ENTITLED to retrieve it and spend it as I choose. In contrast, my next door neighbor or a citizen in the next state is NOT entitled to what is contained in my safe to spend as they choose. If my neighbors aren’t entitled to my safe’s contents then why is my Congressman or my Governor or my mayor? They believe they are because they have ignored the Constitution I spoke of earlier and have created government programs like Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and SCHIP to name a few. Those that enroll in these programs are told they are entitled to what is contained in my safe to fund them, they are wrong and tonight I shall call on you to end this practice and to star calling these programs by what they actually are executing: Legal Plunder. You may also call this theft at the point of the IRS gun.

This brings us to Vocabulary words 4 and 5: Property and Plunder. Property is what is owned outright by a citizen in a free society. Governments are instituted by free men to protect their private property from those who would plunder it. Plunder is the theft of another man’s property with the intention of making it your property. Plunder will always be the preferred method of acquiring property by lazy, designing men and women. Our Constitution and the state governments created and organized by their Constitutions were designed by men who wanted to protect their private property from plunder. Today, at every level of government this formula is now exactly backwards. Governments are organized to execute the plunder safely for the ruling class that doesn’t have the courage to perform the task themselves. The great French philosopher Frederic Bastiat wrote that “men will always choose plunder over profit so long as it is safe and not dangerous to their health” well tonight I call on you to serve notice to the plunderers: plunder just became a very dangerous occupation.



Our governments have created many classes of plunderers and they aren’t all of the direct public assistance variety. They are outnumbered by those plunderers in big business who have decided that buying favor with politicians by funding their campaigns and employing their family and friends in return for subsidies and regulations that punish their competitors is preferable to earning profits the old fashioned way. Plunder also comes in the form of those now infamous bailouts which most of you think have ended…they haven’t. Plunderers can also be found working at expert centers across the country where the rules that government makes are studied to measure their impact and then recommend new rules be made that will require new institutions to study them. And then there are institutions studying institutions and you fellow citizen are paying for every paper they write, pixel they push and paper clip they buy. Plunderers have also set up camp and enlisted tens of thousands of our former military, trained at our expense and now working to keep unneeded and unnecessary weaponry cranking out 24/7. It’s nice work if you can find it and it needs to end because we are broke. In the words of Bill Clinton “It is time to make government plunder unsafe, illegal and rare.”

Tonight, we must commit to begin anew the restoration of virtue and humility in our public affairs. In doing so we will return to our republican roots and I mean to say our “little r-republican roots” and that is our final vocabulary word. Republicanism. Republicanism is the political system that our Founders organized under and can best be defined by citing an obscure statistic. In 1945, young men who returned home from World War II could have formed families and then enlisted to participate in the governing of their local schools. This young man would have had over 115,000 positions to choose from. In a mere 60 years a young woman returning from an undeclared war in Pakistan may choose to start a family and participate in governing her local school only to find it isn’t local any longer and there are less than 13,000 positions available. Republicanism has given way to what our Founders feared more mightily than any Army clad in Red coats or any Tax Act passed by parliament: Consolidation.

Here is what this consolidation of government, which was the design of last centuries “progressives”, who occupied office in both major political parties, has produced: A Federal Leviathan that consumes 24% of every dollar earned in this country. This does not include the unfunded - future liabilities- that are owed as part of the entitlements discussed earlier. In contrast, this same federal government, limited by the restraints the Constitution and fidelity to republicanism placed on it, spent on average no less than 3% of GDP. During this time, our economic liberty, lack of organized plunder and protection of private property produced improvements in the quality of life and life expectancy so unprecedented, new words had to be created to describe them as new devices and compounds were created to continue the improvements. What has truly been lost though cannot be measured in dollars and cents but can be measured in part by the faces of beautiful children who will never know what a father is. At the dawn of the Progressive’s Great Society a shocking amount of black children were born out of wedlock. That shocking number then was 38% after Tens of Trillions in direct wealth transfers and the destruction of inner city families brought on by Progressive initiatives that number is now 70% and I challenge the good people of these United States to coin a term that adequately describes this uniquely American tragedy.

As if this tragedy weren’t enough to ring every fire house bell in the land consider that the rate of illegitimate children born to white, unwed mothers is now approaching the rate the Great Society purported to arrest in 1964, 40% or more. Will we be more successful at stopping this slide into broken or never formed families which we know are recipes for pervasive poverty? Will we recognize that it is the transfer of the responsibility of citizenship from citizens to their government that is the principal culprit in this? Decisions that should be made closest to the people who must live under the burden of their implementation whether that is monetary or undermining of civil liberties have been stolen, “outsourced” if you will to governments and their helpful agencies who rely on their helpful non-partisan institutions. This is government by expert and as we have already heard once tonight this is the exact opposite of what our forefathers fought a revolution for. Is this the best that we can do for our posterity? Let us pray that we can and must do better.

I started this talk tonight by promising to give you an honest accounting of the state of the union, well here it is. Entire generations of Americans have been educated to believe the contorted theories of madmen can be made to work, if we just give them enough time, surrender enough liberty and forego enough prosperity. We have accepted our ruling elites dictates that a constantly devalued paper currency is preferable to a stable one based on a stored supply of a commodity. This is how $11.79 earned by the young hero returning from World War 2 has the purchasing power of exactly $1.00 today what will happen when that number approaches .75 cents then .50?
Our state of the union must also take stock of our future economic capacity. This capacity can only be fueled by one thing: savings. Historically Americans have saved about 8.5% of their income today that number is 3%. These savings represent future capital to be invested in an economic “recovery” and looking at this number that recovery if it happens at all will be weak.

Our state of the union must take into account that more than 16 % of citizens are now relying on direct assistance from the government in the form of food stamps. Over 17% report being unemployed or under employed. Household debt ratios which had begun to decline have now begun to rise again as the average per card -credit card balance now exceeds $5,000. Now armed with these few statistics it is easy to see how a political class chosen from the same group of citizens is so susceptible to corruption and so ignorant of common sense virtues. In short, fellow citizen of these united states it is “We the People” who need to take that long, reflective look in the mirror while demanding our leaders do the same and even that isn’t enough. The tens of millions of customers this Leviathan has created for it’s own perpetuation cannot just simply revert back to a way of life with which they are unfamiliar and when the ability to borrow our way into the next iPhone expires what will they do then? I can’t answer that question but I can tell you this, it is not too late to begin to prepare the way for this inevitability.

Start by getting to know your mayor and the church leaders in your area. Your State Representatives and Senators should be on a first name basis with you too. Drag out a copy of your state constitution and read it, become familiar with it and treat it like the law of the land that it is. Begin to ask questions of these people, ask for their opinions of republicanism and where their first loyalties in government may lie. If they answer “to obey my oath to the Constitution” remind them that that requires not only following the lawful acts of Congress but also opposing with manly vigor those that are not within that bodies power. As one of the great Virginia republicans of the 1790’s, guided by Jefferson and Madison’s resolutions in Ky & VA said “If Congress can oppose state laws it deemed destructive of it’s existence then certainly sovereign states under the Constitution can do the same to preserve themselves.”

You may wonder where the rest of tonight’s State of the Union statistics are and I say to you that if I were to present you a litany of numbers and statistics on the financial and debt crisis these United States is facing it would obscure the message presented here but here’s the short version. We are broke and we are broke to the point that every spending decision we allow any elected leader to make today will have a direct, destructive influence on our posterity. This includes “spending” on national defense & “intelligence” which amounts to 48% of the entire planet’s military and intelligence spending. A great people lead by example not by use of force. George Washington went to his grave praying that his “farewell address” would have lasting impact and inform future generations that a free people only form friendships with other states and “tangling alliances with none”. This requires us to bring our troops home now, end our occupations of 139 countries around the world and eat some humble pie. I hear they are baking lots of it at Congressman Ron Paul’s house these days, why not pay him a visit and hear what he has to say.

Finally let me leave you with a positive thought that though this response was hastily cobbled together and contains a litany of problems to be addressed there remains one great thing going for us that others in our station in life didn’t have and that is a healthy love for liberty and deep abiding respect for the work of our forefathers. Those men fought a revolution meaning they were rolling the clock backwards 1 revolution to life as free people living under their English Constitution and colonies laws. That I believe is a good plan for what Thomas Paine called the “winter soldier” to set his or her sights on. and borrowing a phrase from John F Kennedy, here is something I hope you can incorporate in what Washington called “this great work”.


“Ask not what a government program can do for you, but what you can do to end a government program.” Thank you for watching and listening and my God bless these United States of America.



-Mike Church/Chris Serna , 25 January, 2011

Essentially what the Government has planned is to continue to suck money out of your pockets at an alarming rate by the monster that is Leviathan

Question: How many of you out there have a 5 year spending plan? How about a 5 month spending plan? Yeah, that's what we thought - it's tough to plan to spend things with money you haven't earned yet. Hell, there's accountants out there who don't even have a 5 minute spending plan.
So, since we've knocked the whole '5 year spending plan' out of the park as a viable option it would be ludicrous for anyone to stay on that thought plane right? Absolutely wrong, perhaps you've never met the United States Federal Government and their sparkling 9 year plan taking us to 2020, if everything still exists.

Essentially what the Government has planned is to continue to suck money out of your pockets at an alarming rate by the monster that is Leviathan. These leaves us at status quo - or as we here at Freedom for America like to refer to this situation as a change of deck chairs on the S.S. Leviathan Titanic. It is an infection folks, those who fall for it feel like these agencies and programs aren't so bad, maybe there are benefits somewhere in this hallucination I'm experiencing. Looks like we may be headed to the same destiny as California - going to the highest bidder!

If you missed it(events that lead us to this point)then this will interest you:
Remember when you were younger, high school maybe even college, and you had that big end of the year history test, that dreaded term-paper, or some semester long project that requires 4 months of research and 2 months of prep? Remember how you dove in head first, busted out the books and highlighters, went on a sleeping hiatus, gave all your distractions to charity, and hired a barista for your dorm-room? If you're anything like us you probably don't remember that because you, like the rest of the average student body, put it off until the last minute and then went on a craze-ridden, one-person hailstorm, wrath of cram session all-nighter that produced the sometimes surprising exceptional piece of work, given the circumstances, but usually produced mediocre work at best.

The Democrats have taken it amongst themselves to present us their horribly procrastinated, obviously rushed and poorly thrown together government wide spending bill on Tuesday. The bill is longer than the unabridged version of Alexadre Dumas' 'The Count of Monte Cristo', occupying more than 1,900 pages and intends to cost our already bleeding economy a measly $1.1 trillion. Also folks, when the bill was released there an immediate investigation soon followed by the FDA regarding all the access pork located inside the bill. Hopefully we will soon know what pork is safe for consumption and what pork should be considered waste

Here’s the short list of what was on McCain’s list yesterday, that McCain was reading from, Senator John McCain of Arizona, from the floor of the United States Senate. $277,000 for potato pest management in Wisconsin. I didn’t even know they grew potatoes in Wisconsin. What happened to you cheese heads? I’ve never seen a potato head.

They could be a potato head. Hey, let’s put a moustache on that guy. Not that little skinny one, the big one. $246,000 for bovine tuberculosis research in Michigan and Minnesota. I have a question. Bovine tuberculosis, is that overly large Midwestern gals, or is that bovine of the moo variety? I’m kidding. $522,000 for cranberry and blueberry disease and breeding in New Jersey. $500,000 for oyster safety in Florida. Every one of these, ladies and gentlemen, is unconstitutional. It is unnecessary. It is part of the addiction. It is part of the payoff. This is what your member of Congress does. All of them, save for maybe a handful, five, six, all of them do this. This is how the game is played. You go and you represent those who have paid for your campaign. And we can sit here and talk about Tea Parties from now until the end of the next millennium. And you’ll still have this to deal with until structural systemic changes are made. I’ll get into that. Don’t worry, we’re going to cover that today.

$349,000 for swine waste management in North Carolina. Yes, we must manage the pig poo. $413,000 for peanut research in Alabama. Can’t leave Mr. Planters out, now, can we. By the way, have you seen the commercial? He’s got a Christmas party to throw. We’re throwing the damn Planters Peanuts Christmas party. I wish the nutcracker would crack his head. $247,000 for virus-free wine grapes in Washington. $208,000 for beaver management in North Carolina. No laughing. No laughing, you two. Don’t laugh. No jokes. $94,000 for blackbird management in Louisiana. I didn’t even know we had blackbirds here in Louisiana. Did you know that?

$165,000 for maple syrup research in Vermont. What do you need to research the maple syrup for? You find a maple tree, you drill a hole in the damn thing, and you hang a bucket from it. How hard is this? What are you researching? Synthetic maple syrup? Oh, my goodness.

I would really rather not know the details. This is a partial list of the 6,488 porkulus succubus giveaway projects that are in the omnibus spending bill that the United States Senate is set to pass. This after the “historic election” of 2010. This after allegedly the voters spoke in 2010.
Well, if the voters spoke, and this becomes law, and Obama signs this, and the Congress tries to undo it, and Obama vetoes it, or it can’t get through the United States Senate, it will be business as usual, ladies and gentlemen. Nothing will have materially changed. We’ll be farther and farther in debt. It is just – it’s so damned depressing, it really is. I do not enjoy reading this, even though – that’s why I’m making fun of it, just to try to make the time go by without wanting to weep. $235,000 for noxious weed management in Nevada. $100,000 for the Edgar Allan Poe Cottage Visitor Center in New York. You people want an Edgar Allan Poe Cottage Visitor Center in New York, pay for it yourself. Have a collection. Have the local people put their money up to preserve Poe and to preserve his cottage. Good grief.

$300,000 for the Polynesian Voyaging Society in Hawaii. Polynesian Voyaging Society. I assume that that has something to do with the history of the Polynesians crossing the Pacific Ocean in these reeds, in these little boats made out of reeds. Any of you people remember that nutty Danish guy, what was his name, Thor Heyerdahl, I think. You remember that, back in the ‘70s? This guy came, well, I think we think the Polynesians, we think that the Polynesians crossed the ocean on reed crafts way back in the day, 8,000 years ago. And to prove it, he built a craft out of reeds and sailed, I think – I think he did an Atlantic route, though. I think he sailed from Norway or somewhere up there north of Great Britain to Newfoundland. I don’t remember. But I do remember his name is Thor Heyerdahl. Well, he’s going to get $300,000 to build a brand new reed raft.

$400,000 for solar parking canopies and plug-in electric stations in Kansas. What’s wrong with Kansas? You people are wrong with Kansas. Additionally, according to Senator McCain, the bill earmarks $727,000 to compensate ranchers in Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Michigan whenever endangered wolves eat their cattle. We must now pay for wolf abatement. As my colleagues know, the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service’s grey wolf program is under intense scrutiny for wasting millions of taxpayer dollars every year to recover endangered wolves that are now overpopulating the West and Midwest. So we create the problem by protecting the stupid wolf, and then the wolf goes around and starts eating our food, and now all of a sudden we have to pay to get rid of the wolf. Oh, my gosh.
According to McCain, “This is the ninth omnibus appropriations bill we have considered in this body since 2000. That is shameful, and we should be embarrassed by the fact that we care so little about the people’s business that we continuously put off fulfilling our constitutional responsibilities until the very last minute.” And then McCain goes on to say that he could see that the results of the election were not heard, are not clear, and that the majority party hasn’t got it. Duh. Let me ask you people a question. What made anyone think that the majority party was going to “get it”? Even after they got it, that they were going to get it. Why would anyone even think that? These people are sick.

As I pointed out, this is an actual – you know, we want to spend some earmark money, why don’t we spend a couple of million dollars to study the congressional, the North Atlantic, Mid-Atlantic, Southwestern, Northwestern congressional spendthrift? Homo spendthriftus. How about that? Let’s find out what makes these people tick. Why do you have this disease? What is wrong with your brain? Is there a cure? “Chris, the cure is the ballot box.” Oh, yeah, look how well that’s working out for us.

Now keeping this in mind, back to my point....

How many of you have five-year spending plans? How many of you have a five-month spending plan? You can’t plan to spend things and spend money that has not occurred yet. Yet our federal masters inside Mordor on the Potomac – which, by the way, is being used on very popular blogs out there, and we’re glad to see it. You’re free to use it. You should give credit where you got it from, but you’re free to use it. They’re planning on – they can project out all the way to 2020 what they’re going to spend. How is, number one, how is that possible? And, number two, is that even advisable? Would you even advise someone to try to do that?

I suppose you could manage maybe one or two things that you know you’re going to have to pay. For example, you may know that you’re in the eighth year of a 30-year mortgage, and you’ve got 22 years left to pay. And provided you don’t have an adjustable rate mortgage, or an ARM, you may be able to say, okay, I can project out for the next 18 years that I’m going to have – or 22 years, this is what my note is going to be. I’m going to have to pay this. The only variable there would be homeowners insurance and property taxes. That would be the only thing that would change there if you don’t have an ARM. It’s locked in. I suppose you could plan spending out like that.

But the rest of it, do you know how much you’re going to spend on groceries even next month? You don’t know that. The price of eggs could go through the roof, and they are going to go through the roof. The price of bacon could go through the roof, and it is going to go through the roof. The price of an ear of corn could go through the roof. And it is going to go through the roof. So you don’t know how much you’re going to spend. But don’t worry, Congress has got this under control. We can project this stuff out through 2015.

This is just, you know, it fries my mind to even try and think about this stuff. And the fact that there are so many people out there that have invested their entire lives and their entire professional careers in trying to explain this, and in working to do this, is just mind-boggling to me. What do these people produce other than inaccurate predictions? We used to see these people in little covered wagons with brightly painted canvases on them at sideshows in little Old West towns. They’re out there selling snake oils, looking into crystal balls, rolling rune dice out on a carpet and what have you. But today, no, they work for the federal government, and they make millions. Ridiculous this is. Absolutely, patently ridiculous.

Again, this is so simple as if to be redundant!!!

I know what most of you are thinking out there.....

“Why, you, there you went again. The Republicans come out with a plan, they’re trying to deal with this problem, and you’re depressing people. You’re telling them not to go along with it. You’re just a hater who doesn`t want the republicans succeed....”

I’m telling them the truth as I see it from this chair. H.R. 5 is the bill, folks, which the House approved earlier this month. It already instructs the Budget Committee to publish budget allocations from 2011 to 2015. The resolution to be considered on Wednesday instructs the Budget Committee only to publish 2011 allocations. What does that mean to you? I don’t know what that means to you. AG, can you explain that to the listeners? Because I can’t. I don’t know what...

I don’t know what this means to anyone on earth unless you’re some wonky budget-crunching guy, like the Orszborg, Peter Orszag. This means nothing to the average tax – but I’ll tell you what it does mean to you. What it means is that what is being sucked out of your back pocket or your purse on a daily basis by that menacing monster, Mordor on the Potomac, Leviathan, what is being sucked out of the back of your – out of your back pocket is going to continue to be sucked out of your back pocket. That’s what it means. In other words, ladies and gentlemen, status quo. Nothing has changed. “But we’re going to have some new projections.” Screw you and your projections. Either get to the business of doing this or shut up and get out of the way because we’re going to send somebody there who will.

You know, who am I kidding? It doesn’t matter who we send there. We already know that the brand new members of the Tea Party have been infected by Leviathanitis....Once you have partaken of the water, you have become infected. You fall under the spell of, well, maybe these agencies and these programs aren’t so bad. Yes, yes, yes, I see the benefit of all of them now. This hallucination here of we’re going to cut – here, I’m going to read it to you. The full text of the new resolution reads as follows, ladies and gentlemen.

“Resolved, That, pursuant to section 3(b)(1) of H.R. 5, the Chair of the Committee on the Budget shall include in the Congressional Record an allocation contemplated by section 302(a) for the Committee on Appropriations for the remainder of fiscal year 2011 that assumes a transition to non-security spending at fiscal year 2008 levels.” What does that mean? Let me try and translate that for you. There’s a can sitting on the floor of the House of Representin’, and it’s called Leviathan’s federal budget disaster, looming federal budget disaster. 218 of us are going to take turns walking up to that joker and kicking it as far as we can. By the time we’re done, we’ll probably have the thing kicked into the Potomac River. How far is the Potomac from the Mordor Capitol Dome? Could 435 guys taking turns kicking this thing, if they had, let’s say, Olindo Mare’s leg, could they get that thing to the Potomac River.....

The point I`m trying to make here is that nothing is going to change and if we think the past elections are going to help, you are just fooling yourself!!

Christian Rout in the Culture War

Posted on December 20th, 2010 by Patrick J. Buchanan



A Democratic Congress, discharged by the voters on Nov. 2, has as one of its last official acts, imposed its San Francisco values on the armed forces of the United States.

“Don’t ask, don’t tell” is to be repealed. Open homosexuals are to be welcomed with open arms in all branches of the armed services.

Let us hope this works out better for the Marine Corps than it did for the Catholic Church.

Remarkable. The least respected of American institutions, Congress, with an approval rating of 13 percent, is imposing its cultural and moral values on the most respected of American institutions, the U.S. military.

Why are we undertaking this social experiment with the finest military on earth? Does justice demand it? Was there a national clamor for it?

No. It is being imposed from above by people, few of whom have ever served or seen combat, but all of whom are aware of the power of the homosexual rights lobby. This is a political payoff, at the expense of our military, to a militant minority inside the Democratic Party that is demanding this as the price of that special interest’s financial and political support.

Among the soldiers most opposed to bringing open homosexuals into the ranks are combat veterans, who warn that this will create grave problems of unit cohesion and morale.

One Marine commandant after another asked Congress to consider the issue from a single standpoint:

Will the admission of gay men into barracks at Pendleton and Parris Island enhance the fighting effectiveness of the Corps?
Common sense suggests that the opposite is the almost certain result.

Can anyone believe that mixing small-town and rural 18-, 19- and 20-year-old Christian kids, aspiring Marines, in with men sexually attracted to them is not going to cause hellish problems?

The Marines have been sacrificed by the Democratic Party and Barack Obama to the homosexual lobby, with the collusion of no fewer than eight Republican senators.

This is a victory in the culture war for the new morality of the social revolution of the 1960s and a defeat for traditional Judeo-Christian values. For only in secularist ideology is it an article of faith that all sexual relations are morally equal and that to declare homosexual acts immoral is bigotry.

But while this new morality may be orthodoxy among our elites in the academy, media, culture and the arts, Middle America has never signed on and still regards homosexuality as an aberrant lifestyle, both socially and spiritually ruinous.

To these folks, homosexuality is associated with a high incidence of disease, HIV/AIDS, early death, cultural decadence and civilizational decline. And no sensitivity training at Camp Lejeune is going to change that.

Behind these traditionalist beliefs lie the primary sources of moral authority for traditionalist America: the Old and New Testaments, Christian doctrine, natural law. Thomas Jefferson believed homosexuality should be treated with the same severity as rape.

And 31 consecutive defeats for same-sex marriage in state referenda testifies that Middle America sees the new morality as the artificial invention of pseudo-intellectuals to put a high gloss on a low lifestyle.

Not until recent decades have many in America or the West argued that homosexuality is natural and normal. As late as 1973, the American Psychiatric Association listed homosexuality as a mental disorder.

Today, anyone who agrees with that original APA assessment is himself or herself said to be afflicted with a mental disorder: homophobia.

The world has turned upside down. What was criminal vice in the 1950s — homosexuality and abortion — is not only constitutionally protected, but a mark of social progress.

Yet, just as busing for racial balance led to violence, white flight and the ruin of urban schools, this social experiment is not going to be without consequences. And it is the military that will endure those consequences.

Yet, again, if we believe our armed forces to be the best in the world, why are we doing this, against the advice of countless senior officers and NCOs? What is the motivation other than the payoff of a campaign debt?

What happens now to Evangelical Christian and conservative Catholic chaplains who preach that homosexuality is a sinful and shameful practice? Will they be severed from the service as homophobes?

That cannot be far behind when the Family Research Council, a respected organization of religious and social conservatives that has fought the homosexual agenda from same-sex marriage to gay adoptions, has now been declared by the Southern Poverty Law Center to be a “hate group.”

The advance of what was once a radical agenda has accelerated.

In 2004, John Kerry may have lost Ohio and the presidency because same-sex marriage was on the ballot in almost a dozen states, bringing out committed social conservatives to the polls. Six years later, the gay rights agenda is imposed by Congress and Obama on the 82nd and 101st.

Let the reader decide if the direction America is headed in is toward those “sunny uplands,” or straight downhill.

The Preamble Secures Liberty, Doesn't Provide It

Prior to Woodrow Wilson the aggregate average of Federal Government spending as a percent of GDP was less than 3% - shocking. That would have totaled about 550 billion dollars these days, the Defense Department spends that. So the question remains: How did they survive back then, we should have been invaded and steamrolled by China, Japan, France, Italy, Australia, and the list continues? We can only arrive at one conclusion after taking the Founders Red Pill™ - we don't need this Government.

We need Government to do just a few things and to do those few things well, all the rest of our Liberties should lie in the hands of our Statesmen. The Preamble clearly says 'to secure the blessings of Liberty



to ourselves and our posterity, not to PROVIDE. This is the struggle of man in this Country, and for a very short time we did a fantastic job of securing our Liberties with the help of the Amendment process to address certain things when they change. Then the geniuses inspired by the french and the Germans in the early 20's got a hold of the Government and sent us downhill at a pace that requires more safety precautions than NASCAR. But folks, keep the faith in knowing that this battle is not over. We didn't get to this pathetic State of Leviathan over the weekend by listening to a couple of Commies out there, it was a slow process that is near it's precipice. A new leaf is soon to turn on December 31st, is this the year we begin to take the opposition?

I pay my taxes and you live off me

I just received my property tax bill and the value of my property went up by 12,000????????
We did nothing, did not improve did not add, did not do anything but live here??? I work my a$$ of and you sit on yours, I pay my taxes and you live off me, I buy food for my family you put your hand out for food stamps, I pay my property taxes and you live in subsidized housing for $25.00 a month, I raised my children to earn their own way and you keep having them so the welfare system can give you a bigger check, I pay my electric bill and pay an extra tax on it so you can have free power. I get drug tested to work and you should have to for welfare. I pay health insurance and then pay what the insurance won't, you go in and use your free medical to get drugs for sale, you get kicked off welfare for fraud so you claim to hear voices to get Social Security.....where will it end...it wont as long as the government keeps giving hand outs to the dead beats and supporting the baby factory housing. Times are tough and I am sick of paying for you! It should be required that in order to get welfare you either work for pay or work doing community service...nobody rides for free!!!!!!!!!!

Is Texas making it's Alamo stand against Obama and Boehner's Federale's? It sure seems like it is happening that way

Texas has the opportunity to take matters into its own hands.

Opposition to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, with its embedded health insurance mandates, has stirred a widespread revival of interest in the Tenth Amendment and state sovereignty issues.

The passage of the health care act opened the eyes of many previously apathetic citizens, making them aware of the rapidly expanding scope and influence of the federal government and its intrusiveness into their everyday lives. They intuitively understand that requiring them to purchase health insurance falls far beyond the powers granted to Congress by the Constitution. Suddenly awake and alarmed by the fact that the federal government has grown so far out of control, and frustrated by what they see as the lack of responsiveness by politicians in D.C., many Americans find themselves looking for answers.

And they are turning to their states.

Fourteen states have sued, seeking to block implementation of the unconstitutional health care act. Twelve states, led by Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum filed in federal court in Pensacola.

“The Constitution nowhere authorizes the United States to mandate, either directly or under threat of penalty, that all citizens and legal residents have qualifying health care coverage,” the lawsuit states.

But some states are asserting their own authority to block unconstitutional acts, recognizing that federal courts don’t stand as the sole arbiter of constitutionality.

On Nov. 16, Texas Representative Leo Berman (R-Tyler) filed a bill in the Texas House of Representatives that would nullify federal health care legislation in the the Lone Star State. HB-297 asserts:

The federal Act is not authorized by the United States Constitution and violates the Constitution’s true meaning and intent as expressed by the founders of this country and the ratifiers of the Constitution.
The federal Act:
(1) is invalid in this state;
(2) is not recognized by this state;
(3) is specifically rejected by this state; and
(4) is null and void and of no effect in this state.

The bill takes things a step further, making it a crime for any official, agent, or employee of the United States or an employee of any corporation to enforce any part of the health care act in Texas, and imposes fines up to $5,000 and/or five years in prison for anyone convicted of doing so.

While some might call this legislation radical, it rests squarely within the scope of state power as understood by the framers of the Constitution. James Madison wrote in the Virginia Resolution of 1798 that states not only have a right, but a duty to step in when the federal government oversteps its authority.

That this Assembly doth explicitly and peremptorily declare, that it views the powers of the federal government, as resulting from the compact, to which the states are parties; as limited by the plain sense and intention of the instrument constituting the compact; as no further valid that they are authorized by the grants enumerated in that compact; and that in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of other powers, not granted by the said compact, the states who are parties thereto, have the right, and are in duty bound, to interpose for arresting the progress of the evil, and for maintaining within their respective limits, the authorities, rights and liberties appertaining to them.

Tenth Amendment Center founder Michael Boldin said that Berman’s bill does not represent an extreme viewpoint and insists each state should determine the best path for its own citizens.

“There is nothing more extreme than having a federal government that refuses to abide by the laws that we the people of the several states delegated to it in the Constitution,” he said. “The important point here is that it’s up to the people of each state to determine what the best response may be. One state, as Wyoming did with its Firearms Freedom Act, may decide that penalties on federal agents is the rightful response. Another, such as California with medical marijuana, may choose to create an environment conducive to non-compliance by masses of people. Either way – or somewhere in between – that’s the beauty of the American system. We can have widely varying actions, responses and viewpoints in different states while all living together in peace. One-size-fits-all solutions are actually the problem, and state-by-state decision-making is the natural response.”

Berman said that his bill faces an uphill battle as long as the current Texas House leadership remains in place. The legislation will likely end up bottled up in committee.

“The best chance for passage is to get rid of the current Speaker,” Berman said.

That speaker is Rep. Joe Straus (R – San Antonio)

Straus did not respond to an email request for comment.

Despite the fact that the bill faces long odds for passage, Boldin said introducing this type of legislation remains important,

“Whether or not there’s any guarantee of getting something passed is no reason to not do what’s right,” he said. “Champions look at insurmountable odds and take them on with passion, and that’s what We the People need to do in defense of our liberty.”

And its about baby steps. Boldin said he views the dismantling of an overreaching, bloated federal government a long-term project.

“Dealing with a constitutional monstrosity like Obamacare is going to take time. In the mid-90s, people around the country were saying that it was absurd for California to go it alone and try to pass a medical marijuana law. But they did, and today, we see 15 states openly defying the federal government on this issue,” he said. “The blueprint is straightforward – when enough people say no to the federal government and enough states do so as well, there’s not much that the feds can do to enforce their unconstitutional ‘laws’ on us.”

Madison agreed, Writing in Federalist 46, he laid out the blueprint for constraining overreaching federal power.

“Should an unwarrantable measure of the federal government be unpopular in particular States, which would seldom fail to be the case, or even a warrantable measure be so, which may sometimes be the case, the means of opposition to it are powerful and at hand. The disquietude of the people; their repugnance and, perhaps refusal to cooperate with officers of the Union, the frowns of the executive magistracy of the State; the embarrassment created by legislative devices, which would often be added on such occasions, would oppose, in any State, very serious impediments; and were the sentiments of several adjoining States happen to be in Union, would present obstructions which the federal government would hardly be willing to encounter.”



Texas has taken the first step. Now the people of Texas need to rise up and insist on passage of the bill. Ultimately, the people’s voice will carry the day.

The question remains, will they speak?

special thanks to:
Michael Maharrey

Bill Maher: Real Time With Real Lib

We've got digital media files from 'Real Time With Bill Maher", and although we're not exactly sure why he has his own show we do know that he is a citizen of Libtardia, and on the topic of science, a very uneducated citizen at that. Fortunately for us we have Mike Church, an educated citizen in all things Constitution and Patriotic; something Bill Maher apparently knows nil of. According to the philosophy of the Libtard, if you're a scientist that doesn't work for the government you must not be trusted for you are corrupt. We say: Bill, nobody is denying climate change, of course there is. The planet moves through space and is affected by cosmic forces we have no control over like the Sun and other planets. According to the third grade science project all of America had to take part in, we learned the solar system revolves around the Sun not the Earth, but then again we're using a combination of intelligence, evidence and common sense, something we clearly cannot expect from everyone.

Mr. Maher, we'd like to ask of you to grow a set of nads, then call for what is that you're asking people to follow you to, which is the end of days. Give up your private property, fancy cars, fancy house, retirement funds and so on then maybe we'll discuss issues more pertinent than the solar system.

Climate Change Is Simple

Begin Mike Church Show Transcript

Mike: So you’re not convinced out there, obviously. So Dylligan Ratigan and Ted Rall didn’t convince you. Lawrence O’Donnell, out of the closet now, socialist, and Glenn Greenwald, who’s arguing that somehow Nancy Pelosi is not radical enough, and neither is Barack Hussein Obama – mm, mm, mm. So we need some real revolutionistas, real revoluciones. Listen to Bill Maher here from his monologue on Saturday night. Wasn’t O’Reilly on with Maher on Saturday night?

Mike: I’m pretty sure O’Reilly was in there because I heard him play a digital media file last night from his appearance with Maher, and he really got Maher [chuckling], when Maher said, “Well, Bill, I don’t know why I keep inviting you back on this show,” and O’Reilly said, “Because you want to get better ratings?” [Laughing] Funny stuff. Listen to this delusion here. And by the way, ladies and gentlemen, I don’t know, I don’t know how this got started. But somehow it has become another rite of passage for the revoluciones out there that, if you’re a scientist, and you do not work for the government, then everything you say is not to be trusted, and you cannot possibly have any brain cells to rub together. You have to be in the pay of someone else. You must be crooked, then. You must be corrupt. So only government can provide science now. This is what Maher’s argument on climate change is going to be.

Let me tell you something, Mr. Maher. Why don’t you invite an actual climate scientist on that program of yours, like Dr. Roy Spencer. Why don’t you invite my friend, David Archibald from Australia. He’s quite a funny guy, and he’ll blow you out of the water. Why don’t you invite Marc Morano on your little show there, on “Real Time,” and have an actual discussion about the science behind climate change. Nobody denies, Bill, that there isn’t climate change out there. Of course there’s climate change. The planet moves through space. It is affected by cosmic forces that we have no control over whatsoever, including our sun, and including the movement of other planets, you nitwit. You’re the anti-scientist, you alchemist freak. You think all these giant celestial bodies moving about in space don’t have an impact on this planet? What are you, nuts? Oh, yeah, yeah. What are you, Copernicus now? Everything revolves around Earth?

Don’t be so arrogant and so shallow and stupid, Mr. Maher. You’re the imbecile, and you’re the one that’s not looking at science. I would think that a reasoned people, and people that use reason to think, would probably be safer in concluding that, because we don’t know what’s out there, and because we don’t know all of the effects of the bazillions of planets and stars and galaxies that we continue to discover with all our vaunted technology, we can’t possibly know what effect they have on us. We can’t possible know what their movements have on us. We can’t possibly know what the turning up or down of their thermostats have on us. The stars do fluctuate, do they not? What, do we live in a vacuum here? We’re insulated because we’re Americans and because we have a sign that says, oh, I took a temperature, man, it’s hotter than it was yesterday. So? That’s effect, that’s not cause. There are two parts of hypotheses, sir, cause and effect. You’re telling me the effect, you’re not telling me the cause. Play your digital media file because Dr. Spencer heard this. What happened was that an actual climate scientist had heard this, and has responded it to it already. Roll the digital media file.

[Clip] Bill Maher: But the message of the rally, as I heard it, was that if the media would just stop giving voice to the crazies on both sides, then maybe we could restore sanity. It was all nonpartisan and urged cooperation with the moderates on the other side, forgetting that Obama tried that and found out there are no moderates on the other side.

Mike: Eh heh, eh heh. You mean the moderates that grew the debt twice?

[Clip] Bill Maher: When Jon announced his rally, he said that the national conversation is dominated by people on the right who believe Obama is a socialist, and people on the left who believe 911 was an inside job. But I can’t name any Democratic leaders who think 911 was an inside job. But Republican leaders who think Obama is a socialist? All of them. McCain, Boehner, Cantor, Palin, all of them. It’s now official Republican dogma, like tax cuts pay for themselves and gay men just haven’t met the right woman.

Mike: Eh heh, eh heh, eh heh, so funny. Ha ha ha ha, I’m laughing.

[Clip] Bill Maher: As another example of both sides using overheated rhetoric, Jon cited the right equating Obama with Hitler and the left calling Bush a war criminal. Except thinking Obama is like Hitler is utterly unfounded, but thinking Bush is a war criminal, that’s the opinion of General Anthony Taguba, who headed the army’s investigation into Abu Ghraib.

Mike: Pause this. Pause this madman for just a second here. HBO is irresponsible. I should cancel my HBO subscription when I get home tonight. Number two, who accuses Obama of being like Hitler? Who? I’ll say it right now to your face, Bill. He’s not like Hitler because he doesn’t have the ‘nads that Hitler had to actually come in and use the military, thank the Lord he doesn’t have the ‘nads, to get his way. He doesn’t have the ‘nads to actually be a national socialist like Hitler was, like you want him to be, Bill, and to come in and take the remaining wealth that remains with the American public and expropriate it and use it the way you think he ought to use it. Right?

You don’t have the ‘nads to ask him to be like Hitler, Bill. That’s the big thing that’s missing. You’re the sissy, sir. Why don’t you get off your little throne there in Hollywood, and why don’t you send a letter to the President, and why don’t you tell him that you and all your little buddies out there in Tinseltown, in Hollywoodland, will absolutely support him if he calls up the 101st Airborne and starts sending them out into the hinterlands and into the neighborhoods to do exactly what Hitler did, serve notice to the people that your private property is not yours anymore because we have a national problem to fix and because we need some manufacturing jobs, so we’re just going to start confiscating all the steel that’s left in your tractors out there. Why don’t we try that? Oh, wait, Mike, that was Stalin that did that. Oh, gosh, wrong henchman. Why don’t you grow a set, Bill? You and your buddy Dylan Ratigan.
And why don’t you actually call for what it is that you’re asking people to follow you to, which is Hades, which is the end of days? Hmm? Hmm? Why don’t you have the courage of your convictions, sir? How about giving your private property up first? How about giving up your big fancy car? How about giving up your big fancy house? How about giving up any retirement funds that you have? What makes you exempt from the confiscation of wealth, Mr. Maher? Hmm? I love these limousine liberals, like George Carlin called them once, who think the only problem with this country is that we don’t have enough bicycle paths. Why don’t you lead the way? Why don’t you get with your buddies, with your buddies on the left there, so desperately want to see all of these things go away?

Because at the end of the day it’s those pesky little individuals that get in your way, Mr. Maher. It’s those pesky individuals that refuse to be knuckled-under and steamrolled by their government and refuse to surrender what little wealth they have left and what little liberty they have left that stand in your way. Well, we’re not going to get out of your way, Mr. Maher. Let me inform you of something, sir. Bring it on. You and all your little crook friends. You’re the one that’s on the wrong side of history, and you’re the one, despite your little rhetoric and your little comedy bits and all your little sycophants out there going “Yay, Bill, yay, you’re funny, yeah.” O’Reilly may want to sit down and hang out with you and think it’s funny for ratings because, oh, he’s such a fair guy. Well, I’m fair, too. Grow a set, Bill. Grow a set, Mr. Maher.

End Mike Church Show Transcript


Now, I ask you hows that for telling it like it is and not pulling any punches??